None:
Polyps:
Strongs:

The Lexis And The Lucis

Other than the "bright and morning star" which is Christ and the "angel of the church in Thyatira" as re-awarded with his unique station of "Morning Star" for his victory over Satan in Revelation, the book of Job has a reference to the "morning stars" of creation.

Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? (KJV)

No number is placed upon them, yet there are two commonly reckoned, the "logos" (word) and "lucis" (light).

Yet the "light" (which is virtue), if a "morning star" is often confused with "light-bearer" or "Lucifer", I.e. Satan, who has never been redeemed and never will be, and therefore is never such a morning star.

Now, how many times have you seen a Christian wearing a "WWJD?" bracelet as in "What would Jesus do?" After this manner Jesus is referenced as "light" rather than "logos" as if the "light to the world", which is certainly the case. Yet we are told by John that Christ is also "the word made flesh" and that His light was the light of men, as "that light".

So, is Jesus both logos, lucis and something else entirely? (I hope to argue I also require the "lexis".)

I would rather in the case of every Christian, that instead of "WWJD?", they would ask "WDJS?" or "What did Jesus say?", which is also all that He Himself did, for there was no lie at all in Him and WDJS? answers the right question every time - Jesus would perform the word of the Father that had been given to Him to do for His Father's name's sake, and not to let people imagine what could be done, but to convict all in a humble contrition that He, Christ, has done it for them.

Now, are all Christ's words virtue? Certainly not if taken literally, for burning a man in eternal torment is certainly not virtue if it occurs by accident of birth or of location or timing etc. Such literal truths should be read in terms of the lexicon established in Christ's revelation as well as the intent of His parables and this is also given to us, that we would neither seeing see or learning understand and that is all we are taught on that matter that Christ's is a mystery religion. There is then a requirement for a "lexis", as "lucis" (or light) is not adequate for the transmission of the interpretation of the scriptures, instead we are required to study instead.

2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (KJV)

Now, I would put forth that Christ is also the author and judge of our faith, and so "lexis" is again, one and the same with Jesus, as all scripture points to His interpretation and transmission of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven to His disciples alone; we are told that no prophecy is of a "personal interpretation" but known only as the "testimony of Jesus".

2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. (KJV)

Rev 19:10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. (KJV)

And the lexis is certainly significant, unlocking the metaphysics and in doing so revealing the gospel in complete alignment with the scriptural text (see the book "Seven Eyes Open").

Now, is "light" a morning star? I would say that the light in Christ is certainly the light of men, and this is not found a morning star. Instead, the light of men is merely as human virtue and the bride of Christ which is called to exemplify it is certainly not the "morning star"; only Christ and His angel (the least in the kingdom) may lay claim to that as becomes any and all men. Instead, I would demote "lucis" from any status as of a morning star altogether, and declare the seven Spirits of God as the "logos" within the framework of the "lexis" established in the scriptures by Christ.

So, Satan is never a morning star (as relating to "light bearer"), but the least in the kingdom of heaven is certainly a "morning star" - and I would also happily promote "lexis" to the status of a "morning star" in that it is as the additive identity element of the octal; God's word is interpreted in line with that lexis, as established and where it is referenced.

Similarly, I have the axiom of G=>G&l in the sixteenth chapter of the book "Seven Eyes Open" as well as that God, is always the "God of the least". No positive reason exists against the election of such a least, and as a morning star, the least must hold true to God's word, and I would state that "lexis" is partially correct, but that the true nature of that morning star is to become as if "understanding", and raw understanding at that. For if one has true understanding the lexicon or vocabulary of God's word becomes immediately apparent, and there is no mistake made in that - I then understand the lexis to be anything but acquired, it is not inherited "wisdom" but is instead transmitted through the Spirit of God as if  “God breathed” - His scripture as His pure word.

Whilst "light" points to righteousness, it is not the case that it (lucis) will ever unlock the sevenfold "logos" or that “word” of the Spirit of God; instead, it becomes certain that unity in the field GF(8) is "light" as a pure consequence of God’s word (oil or doctrine) and God's Spirit (fire) which together make a lamp (as if light) to guide us in all things. But the zero or additive identity is unnamed but for becoming that same raw understanding; and in its minimal form, this understanding is only transmitted in the guise of a lexis, a "Spiritual vocabulary". And so I rest on the "lexis" as integral to the scriptures, a morning star.

So, does all scriptural understanding fall and rise again justified? Not so in the sign of Christ's coming alone to end all things, but as in all understanding of the scripture, as it becomes aged or tired in tradition - the correct lexis unlocks Genesis and Revelation and should qualify every book between them.

In that sense, if the scripture has fallen out of touch with reality - it is a clear sign those that claim to understand do not so understand, as God’s word as if "l" (both lexis and logos) is always with God our creator (as if “G”). Thus G => G&l and the word of scripture is always the word of the creator, and we have all fallen short but for the least and Christ Himself - but the scripture cannot be broken and there is understanding there in that verse for those that will find it - after making a long search too! (Unless you have found that truth here of course!).

Then the scriptures will always appear to fall but rise again justified and do so shining, with the “big bang” and evolution and all truth given for us on whom the end of the age has come.


Return To Section Start

Return To Previous Page