None:
Polyps:
Strongs:

Who And What Is God?

Firstly, I would hope to qualify the word "God". "God", is the name of a mystery rather than of a person. It is an office - one referencing the highest authority that can be possibly imagined - one that has sovereignty in every matter. But just how?

Whilst God is the "solution" to this mystery, the office of "God" is held by the Holy Trinity - a sevenfold spiritual construct that has chosen to reveal Himself to mankind through only one form and method - the octal group that acts in each disjunction as a didactic top-down authority that has never claimed for itself the right to change the rules it has established unjustly. (For the derivation of the octal used in every such disjunction, see the book "Seven Eyes Open".)

As long as the person of "God" holds that office and is found forever continuing the didactic authority inherant in those fixed statutes and precepts of His covenants with man, "God", is forever Holy and then also a just judge over us all, because He has kept the octal intact in every single one of His many interactions with us, by not laying upon us heavy burdens in commandments that cannot be kept; He has been faithful and true in this regard and assures us through His word that "we" are truly His creations and He is justly our creator.

So, as every interaction has taken the same octal or didactic form, there is no dialectic in God other than the omnipotent ability of last resort - to rewriting creation itself to satisfy His own word - one such act is given us in the flood of Noah in this regard, of which God has justly sworn never to repeat such an act again.

Man, however routinely uses the dialectic to excuse his behaviour by stating that an impossible work for a human excuses the actions of their evil, as long as it is "mostly good" or only a "little evil" (or its diabolical opposite). God, would call this mere excuse "sin", for that indeed it is.

God, then, offers salvation only in the didactic (good) paradigm to man, so that God may be recognised as the ever present and close-dwelling Spirit that knows us all, as if the curator of the world as a system where everything is catalogued, nothing is lost and all things work together for His purpose to redeem His fallen creation - as long as we recognise He is not at fault, and that only we are.

Those two paradigms then, seem out of sorts with the construction of the Trinity from omnipresence (see the book "Seven Eyes Open") unless it is realised that God has "chosen" to be good (and didactic) as this is stable, and constant and good in that there is no lie in it, only a relationship of truth that reveals more of its charity and kindness to mankind as that relationship continues. God, is our loving Father in the heavens, and He himself, despite all our suffering is not diminished for existing in His creation and not fallen in then leaving it (the evening and the morning are the one same day for a "morning star") He assures us from the opening of Genesis that our eternal life is likewise not diminished despite living in the fallen creation, for God has indeed visited His people in the person of Jesus Christ - Himself filling the office of God "with us", and He is to be cherished, worshiped and exalted forever.

Now, that stated, can any man fault God for all His wrath, His anger, jealousy and all His other oft pointed-out faults that we perceive as imperfect in our esteemed opinions? Surely not, as God has always remained as acting only in the didactic, and of course (sarcasm) man would be so much better to do it himself in the dialectic, would he not?

Of course, you may not have seen His flashing lights in your rear view mirror, but at your judgement, would stating you worshiped an atheist instead free you of that fatal dialectic grip on your soul? In all honesty, it would not. (If your soul was never to be judged didactically, would anyone instead trust it to a judge and a creator "mostly not-corrupt"?)

God, then, is not only the recipe for "goodness", but the cure for the ailment of "evil". There is no truth in the latter when it is simply chosen to be the dialectic: it shadows the office of "God" and offers no truthful solution: the "enemy", ever present with man's own nature is no contest for God, and we are as much God's instruments as is the enemy and we are all to be tested and tried to see if there is good to be revealed not in us, but instead in saving us in that we must love each other and also God and His paradigm if we are to be found worthy of our own rescue. It is not God that would torment us for that, only our unbelief that despite our evil and dialectic and our "mostly good" we are always steeped in evil and we are ever-failing to be our own "God", as the planet we have ruined rightly attests.


Continue To Next Page

Return To Section Start